<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Is An Upgrade Worth To You?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jimmitchell.org/2009/01/17/what-is-an-upgrade-worth-to-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jimmitchell.org/2009/01/17/what-is-an-upgrade-worth-to-you/</link>
	<description>Mac Morsels and Other Useful Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 00:06:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Banther</title>
		<link>http://jimmitchell.org/2009/01/17/what-is-an-upgrade-worth-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Banther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmitchell.org/?p=745#comment-388</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As a systems administrator and a &quot;pro&quot; small business person, I believe it is up to the company itself.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For some, if they choose to allow unlimited upgrades for the life of the product to established customers, then I believe it is their right. I would tend to follow this line since I believe that keeping the established customers in a state of contentment with the product is a social and business positive.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For others, if they choose to pull a &quot;Redmond&quot; and charge for the mouse and the mouse-trap then that is their right. I believe it is a poor business model and doomed to eventually fail.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a systems administrator and a &#8220;pro&#8221; small business person, I believe it is up to the company itself.</p>

<p>For some, if they choose to allow unlimited upgrades for the life of the product to established customers, then I believe it is their right. I would tend to follow this line since I believe that keeping the established customers in a state of contentment with the product is a social and business positive.</p>

<p>For others, if they choose to pull a &#8220;Redmond&#8221; and charge for the mouse and the mouse-trap then that is their right. I believe it is a poor business model and doomed to eventually fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://jimmitchell.org/2009/01/17/what-is-an-upgrade-worth-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmitchell.org/?p=745#comment-387</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I prefer the way that Adobe used to do upgrades before all of the CS nonsense.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When version 1 was made obsolete by version 2, they would sell a special upgrade copy of v2 at half the price of the full copy.  The catch was that the upgrade copy required both v2 and v1 serial numbers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This allowed Adobe to restrict half-price upgrade copies to users of the previous version, without the need to &quot;keep track of a user base&quot; as you mentioned.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They have since done away with this type of offer (and raised their prices to add insult to injury), so I have upgraded to Pixelmator.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the way that Adobe used to do upgrades before all of the CS nonsense.</p>

<p>When version 1 was made obsolete by version 2, they would sell a special upgrade copy of v2 at half the price of the full copy.  The catch was that the upgrade copy required both v2 and v1 serial numbers.</p>

<p>This allowed Adobe to restrict half-price upgrade copies to users of the previous version, without the need to &#8220;keep track of a user base&#8221; as you mentioned.</p>

<p>They have since done away with this type of offer (and raised their prices to add insult to injury), so I have upgraded to Pixelmator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

